Categories
Logic

Write a formal deductive essay, 1-2 pages long, based on the subject of critical

Write a formal deductive essay, 1-2 pages long, based on the subject of critical thinking, logic, and rhetoric.
Topic: Has the third party in American national politics been historically unsuccessful in elections? If so, why? If not, why not?
Include a title page and reference page
Page count does not include either the title page or the reference page.

Categories
Logic

Has the third party in American national politics been historically unsuccessful in elections? If so, why?

Write a formal deductive essay, 1-2 pages long, based on the subject of critical thinking, logic, and rhetoric.
Topic: Has the third party in American national politics been historically unsuccessful in elections? If so, why? If so, why? If not, why not?
Include a title page and reference page
Page count does not include either the title page or the reference page.

Categories
Logic

Write a formal deductive essay, 1-2 pages long, based on the subject of critical

Write a formal deductive essay, 1-2 pages long, based on the subject of critical thinking, logic, and rhetoric.
Topic: Has the third party in American national politics been historically unsuccessful in elections? If so, why? If not, why not?
Include a title page and reference page
Page count does not include either the title page or the reference page.

Categories
Logic

2 essay questions (so call short questions) focused on Reasoning, each question

2 essay questions (so call short questions) focused on Reasoning, each question max. 100 words. Extra work will not be counted.
1 Venn diagram question [hand- written first, then take the picture and attach the picture onto the word file for submission in Turnitin](Convert the word file into the pdf file)
Submit the answer scriipt
in PDF format to Turnitin under tutorial class link
The attached screenshots is the questions.

Categories
Logic

The article you’ll be using is Aristotle BOOK:ARTICLE. -Please don’t use any ot

The article you’ll be using is Aristotle BOOK:ARTICLE.
-Please don’t use any other sources beside the information I gave you.
You must identify an argument by referring to its conclusion. You must state how many premises it contains. You must explain each premise, step-by-step. Each premise should be quoted, not just summarized. No more than 1 premise per paragraph. Then, you must apply the terminology from chapters 1-3 from the textbook to the argument. Please before everything else read “ESSAY OUTLINE” CHAPTER 1-3 are vocabulary that you have to use and apply.

Categories
Logic

the problem is to determine in scope and out of scope subject in the stream page

the problem is to determine in scope and out of scope subject in the stream page status locked report. the unique identifier is subject name, folder name and form name, that’s column IKM.
In scope subject will have dates present in the audit trail report compare Subject ,folder and form Thats column CDEM in audit trail report.
Note, stream page status has no dates, I want forms that have date present in audit trail pulled into stream page status, if date is presnt subject is inscope, if date is absent subject is out of scope

Categories
Logic

Why or why not?

Post 1: Answer the following questions in-depth and based on the critical thinking that you have learned thus far in our class (do not base your responses on your opinion). Your initial post should be at least 150 words.
What is the main conclusion (claim) of this advertisement?
What are the premises or pieces of evidence on which the claim is based?
Does this argument contain a premise indicator(s)? If so, what is it specifically?
Does this argument contain a conclusion indicator(s)? If so, what is it specifically?
Is the inference or critical thinking process here sound? Why or Why Not?
*And remember: To earn credit, cite all sources – even those found within the discussion forum prompt or on the course page – in MLA format – at the end of your post. Be as thorough as possible when writing your topic/posts.

Categories
Logic

Why or why not?

Post 1: Answer the following questions in-depth and based on the critical thinking that you have learned thus far in our class (do not base your responses on your opinion). Your initial post should be at least 150 words.
What is the main conclusion (claim) of this advertisement?
What are the premises or pieces of evidence on which the claim is based?
Does this argument contain a premise indicator(s)? If so, what is it specifically?
Does this argument contain a conclusion indicator(s)? If so, what is it specifically?
Is the inference or critical thinking process here sound? Why or Why Not?
*And remember: To earn credit, cite all sources – even those found within the discussion forum prompt or on the course page – in MLA format – at the end of your post. Be as thorough as possible when writing your topic/posts.

Categories
Logic

What were the consequences (negative or positive) which resulted from this event?


Topic
How are my beliefs affected by psychological obstacles?
From the field problem in Chapter 2, think of a situation in your life in which psychological obstacles of self-interest, face-saving, or group pressure affected what you said or did. In order to answer this respond to the following questions:
Did one or more of thee obstacles affect your beliefs?
What were the consequences (negative or positive) which resulted from this event?
If you had already taken the critical thinking course, what ideas from Chapter 1 and 2 might have altered the outcome?
We all have at one time or another fallen into these kinds of traps which lead us to do things we sometimes later regret. But if we are forewarned about the dangers of these obstacles we are less likely to fall prey to them.
The Power of Critical Thinking, Lewis Vaughn, Sixth Edition Chapter 2, “Obstacles of Critical Thinking”

Categories
Logic

What were the consequences (negative or positive) which resulted from this event?


Topic
How are my beliefs affected by psychological obstacles?
From the field problem in Chapter 2, think of a situation in your life in which psychological obstacles of self-interest, face-saving, or group pressure affected what you said or did. In order to answer this respond to the following questions:
Did one or more of thee obstacles affect your beliefs?
What were the consequences (negative or positive) which resulted from this event?
If you had already taken the critical thinking course, what ideas from Chapter 1 and 2 might have altered the outcome?
We all have at one time or another fallen into these kinds of traps which lead us to do things we sometimes later regret. But if we are forewarned about the dangers of these obstacles we are less likely to fall prey to them.
The Power of Critical Thinking, Lewis Vaughn, Sixth Edition Chapter 2, “Obstacles of Critical Thinking”